Mathematics Teachers’ Understanding of the Deep Learning Approach in Instructional Module Development

Authors

  • Sukmawati Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia Author
  • Chelsi Yuliana S Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia Author
  • Ria Ristiani Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v7i1.13

Keywords:

deep learning approach, teaching modules, elementary school, mixed methods

Abstract

The era of disruption, characterized by rapid change and an overwhelming flow of information, demands a transformation in educational paradigms, particularly in the development of deep learning mindsets among elementary school teachers. This study aims to analyze mathematics teachers’ understanding of the deep learning approach as reflected in the preparation of teaching modules in Keerom Regency, Papua. A mixed methods approach with a sequential explanatory design was employed. Quantitative data were collected through a Likert scale questionnaire administered to ten elementary mathematics teachers, followed by qualitative data gathered through in depth interviews with selected teachers and document analysis of teaching modules. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman. The results indicate that 20% of teachers demonstrated a high level of understanding of deep learning, 60% were categorized at a moderate level, and 20% showed a low level of understanding. Teachers with a high level of understanding were able to integrate meaningful, mindful, and joyful learning elements into their teaching modules through student centered activities, authentic assessments, and reflective practices. In contrast, teachers with moderate and low levels of understanding tended to rely on procedural activities and conventional assessments, indicating limited implementation of deep learning principles. The integration of quantitative and qualitative findings reveals a strong consistency between teachers’ conceptual understanding and the quality of the teaching modules they developed. These findings highlight the need for continuous professional development and targeted mentoring to enhance teachers’ capacity to implement deep learning effectively in mathematics instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berman, E. A. (2017). An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Researchers’ Data Management Practices at UVM: Integrated Findings to Develop Research Data Services. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2017.1104

Feri, M., Nur Ismiati, Widya Rahmawati Al-Nur, & Farah Nabila Akbar. (2025). Implementing Deep Learning Approaches in Primary Education: A Literature Review. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 178–194. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v37i2.12151

Fredrickson, B. L. (2000). Cultivating positive emotions to optimize health and well-being. Prevention & Treatment, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/1522-3736.3.1.31a

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. J. (2018). Deep Learning: Engage the World Change the World. https://www.amazon.com/Deep-Learning-Engage-World-Change/dp/1506368581

Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, Joanne J. (2018). Deep Learning: Engage the World, Change the World. Corwin. https://michaelfullan.ca/articles/2011-2015/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Hammond, L. D., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. http://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/works/4yGMgNx9/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Hattie, J. (2012, January). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximising Impact on Learning | Request PDF. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270585208_Visible_Learning_for_Teachers_Maximising_Impact_on_Learning

Kaur, T., Kersting, M., Adams, K., Blair, D., Treagust, D., Popkova, A., Boublil, S., Santoso, J., Ju, L., Zadnik, M., Wood, D., Horne, E., McGoran, D., Scott, S., & Venville, G. (2023). Developing and implementing an Einsteinian science curriculum from Years 3 to 10: Part B Teacher upskilling: response to training and teacher’s classroom experience (arXiv:2306.17344). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.17344

Koskinen, R., & Pitkäniemi, H. (2022). Meaningful Learning in Mathematics: A Research Synthesis of Teaching Approaches. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0679. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11715

Masuku, M., Jili, N. N., & Sabela, P. T. (2021). Assessment practices that promote deep learning in classroom instruction. African Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 654–662.

Mezirow, J. (2018). Transformative Learning and the Test of Truth: Towards Conceptual Validation—Rian Roux, 2026. Routledge. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/15413446251338055?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Mu’ti, A. (2025). Apa itu Deep Learning? Ini Penjelasan Mendikdasmen Abdul Mu’ti. https://www.kompas.com/edu/read/2025/02/14/182322371/apa-itu-deep-learning-ini-penjelasan-mendikdasmen-abdul-muti

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sukmawati, S, C. Y., & Ristiani, R. (2026). Mathematics Teachers’ Understanding of the Deep Learning Approach in Instructional Module Development. Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 7(1), 14-21. https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v7i1.13

Similar Articles

1-10 of 119

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.