Cognitive Level Analysis of Problems in Mathematics Textbook Class XII Revision 2018 Materials of Congress and Construction Based on The Revised Bloom Taxonomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v2i2.97Keywords:
Mathematics Textbook, Congruence, Similarity, Question, Revised Bloom's Taxonomy, Cognitive LevelAbstract
This study aims to describe the distribution of cognitive levels of questions in the 2018 Revised Class XII Mathematics Textbook for Congruence and Similarity Based on Bloom's Taxonomy. Bloom's Taxonomy used is a revised Bloom's Taxonomy with cognitive process dimensions consisting of: remembering(C1), understanding(C2), applying(C3), analyzing(C4), evaluating(C5), and creating(C6). This type of research was descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Sources of data in this study were questions about the material congruence, similarity and competency test questions contained in the mathematics textbooks of class XII students. The research was carried out with the method of collecting documentation data and using research instruments in the form of analysis sheets and analysis conformity sheets. The results showed that the distribution of the cognitive level of questions on the congruence and similarity material contained the cognitive level of understanding(C2) as much as 18.2%, applying(C3) as much as 50% and analyzing(C4) as much as 31.8%, with the dominant cognitive level being cognitive level of applying(C3) and does not include cognitive levels of remembering(C1), evaluating(C2) and creating(C6). So it was found that the distribution of the cognitive level of the questions on the material of congruence and similarity topic did not vary or was not proportional.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. W. (2001). Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan asesmen: Revisi taksonomi pendidikan Bloom (Terjemahan Agung Prihantoro, 2010). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ariyana, Y., Pudjiastuti, A., Bestari, R., & Zamroni. (2019). Buku pegangan pembelajaran berorientasi keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi (HOTS). Jakarta.
As’ari, A. R., Chandra, T. D., & Yuwono, I. (2018). Matematika (Edisi ke-2). Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Darna, N., & Herlina, E. (2018). Memilih metode penelitian yang tepat: Bagi penelitian bidang ilmu manajemen. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 5(1), 287–292. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/ekonologi/article/view/1359
Helmawati. (2019). Pembelajaran dan penilaian berbasis HOTS. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Kusumawati, I. (2014). Identifikasi proses berpikir siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah pembuktian dua segitiga kongruen berdasarkan perbedaan gender. MATHEdunesa (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 3(3), 114–119. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/12774
Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2018). Penelitian pendidikan matematika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Mita, D. O., Agustinsa, R., & Susanto, E. (Tahun tidak tercantum). Analisis soal berdasarkan level kognitif. [Data publikasi perlu dilengkapi].
Priatna, N., & Yuliardi, R. (2019). Pembelajaran matematika untuk guru SD dan calon guru SD. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ratnawulan, E., & Rusdiana, A. (2014). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Sudjana, N. (2011). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar (Edisi ke-6). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Susanti, N., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Kurniati, D. (2015). Analisis tingkat kognitif uji kompetensi pada buku sekolah elektronik (BSE) matematika SMP/MTs kelas VII kurikulum 2013 berdasarkan taksonomi Bloom. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 6(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v6i1.4509
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
