Cognitive Level Analysis of Problems in Mathematics Textbook Class XII Revision 2018 Materials of Congress and Construction Based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy

  • Dira Oktia Mita Universitas Bengkulu
  • Ringki Agustinsa Universitas Bengkulu
  • Edi Susanto Universitas Bengkulu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v2i2.56
Keywords: mathematics textbook, congruence, revised bloom's taxonomy, cognitive level

Abstract

Abstract:This study aims to describe the distribution of cognitive levels of questions in the 2018 Revised Class XII Mathematics Textbook for Congruence and Similarity Based on Bloom's Taxonomy. Bloom's Taxonomy used is a revised Bloom's Taxonomy with cognitive process dimensions consisting of: remembering(C1), understanding(C2), applying(C3), analyzing(C4), evaluating(C5), and creating(C6). This type of research was descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Sources of data in this study were questions about the material congruence, similarity and competency test questions contained in the mathematics textbooks of class XII students. The research was carried out with the method of collecting documentation data and using research instruments in the form of analysis sheets and analysis conformity sheets. The results showed that the distribution of the cognitive level of questions on the congruence and similarity material contained the cognitive level of understanding(C2) as much as 18.2%, applying(C3) as much as 50% and analyzing(C4) as much as 31.8%, with the dominant cognitive level being cognitive level of applying(C3) and does not include cognitive levels of remembering(C1), evaluating(C2) and creating(C6). So it was found that the distribution of the cognitive level of the questions on the material of congruence and similarity topic did not vary or was not proportional. with the dominant cognitive level being cognitive level of applying(C3) and does not include cognitive levels of remembering(C1), evaluating(C2) and creating(C6). So it was found that the distribution of the cognitive level of the questions on the material of congruence and similarity topic did not vary or was not proportional. with the dominant cognitive level being cognitive level of applying(C3) and does not include cognitive levels of remembering(C1), evaluating(C2) and creating(C6). So it was found that the distribution of the cognitive level of the questions on the material of congruence and similarity topic did not vary or was not proportional.

Keywords: Mathematics Textbook, Congruence, Similarity, Question, Revised Bloom's Taxonomy, Cognitive Level.

References

Anderson, LW, & Krathwohl, DW (2001). Basic Framework for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment Revised Bloom's Education Taxonomy. Translation by Agung Prihantoro. (2010). Yogyakarta: Student Library.

Ariyana, Y., Pudjiastuti, A., Bestari, R., & Zamroni. (2019). Handbook of Learning Oriented on Higher-Level Thinking Skills.Jakarta

As’ari, A. R., Chandra, T. D., & Yuwono, I. (2018). Matematika (ke dua).Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Darna, N., & Herlina, E. (2018). Choosing the Right Research Method: For Research in the Field of Management Science. Journal of Management Science, 5(1), 287–292. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/ekonologi/article/view/1359

Helmawati. (2019). HOTS Based Learning and Assessment. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Kusumawati, I. (2014). Identification of the Thinking Process of Middle School Students in Solving Problems Proving Two Congruent Triangles Based on Gender Differences. MATHEdunesa (Scientific Journal of Mathematics Education), 3(3), 114–119. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/12774

Lestari, KE, & Yudhanegara, MR (2018). Mathematics Education Research. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Priatna, N., & Yuliardi, R. (2019). Mathematics Learning for Elementary School Teachers and Prospective Elementary Teachers. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ratnawulan, E., & Rusdiana, A. (2014). Learning Evaluation. Bandung: Setia Pustaka Bandung

Sudjana, N. (2011). Assessment of Teaching and Learning Results (6th ed.). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Susanti, N., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Kurniati, D. (2015). Analysis of the cognitive level of competency testing on electronic school books (BSE) of mathematics for SMP/MTs grade VII 2013 Curriculum based on Bloom's Taxonomo. Creative-Innovative Mathematics, 1, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v6i1.4509

Published
2021-12-08
How to Cite
Mita, D., Agustinsa, R., & Susanto, E. (2021). Cognitive Level Analysis of Problems in Mathematics Textbook Class XII Revision 2018 Materials of Congress and Construction Based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy. Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 2(2), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v2i2.56
Issue
Vol 2 No 2 (2021): November 2021
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the journal.
  • Authors can publish papers separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions by acknowledging that the manuscripts have been published for the first time in  Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR).
  • The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License (CC BY SA): This license allows to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially.