Reviewing Lessons With Mind Mapping By The Help Of 6 Questions Cognitive Model To Help Students Learn Better
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v2i1.88Keywords:
Linear equations in two variables1, 6 questions cognitive model, Mind mappingAbstract
Review lessons after class can help students increase student achievement but not necessarily students know how to review effective and efficient learning. This learning goal is to explain how to review effective and efficient lessons using Mind Mapping and 6 Cognitive Model Questions. The subject on this study are 155 junior high school students. The topic of Linear Mathematics Equations in Two variables is described using a qualitative method. Experimented with 3 classes with the same level in the Pianlian Central SchoolStudy, The three teaching effects of using and not using mind mapping and 6 Questions Cognitive Model were compared, shows that Mind Mapping and 6 Cognitive Model Questions can improve critical thinking skills, high order thinking abilities and systematic thinking skills. Mind Mapping and 6 Cognitive Models Helping Students to review Linear Equations in Two Variables and get Deep Learning.
Downloads
References
Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Mathematics education in the early years. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(2), 107–122.
Bakar, K. A., Ayub, A. F. M., Luan, W. S., & Tarmizi, R. A. (2010). Exploring secondary school students’ motivation using technologies in teaching and learning mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4650–4654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.744
Bernard, M., & Chotimah, S. (2018). Improve student mathematical reasoning ability with open-ended approach using VBA for PowerPoint. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054417
Bertram, T., & Pascal, C. (2016). Early childhood policies and systems in eight countries: IEA’s early childhood education study. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39847-1
Cunhua, L., Ying, Z., Qunzhuang, O., & Wijaya, T. T. (2019). Mathematics course design based on six questions cognitive theory using Hawgent Dynamic Mathematics. Journal on Education, 2(1), 36–44.
Dewi, S. N., Wijaya, T. T., Budianti, A., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2018). Pengaruh model Teams Games Tournament terhadap kemampuan pemahaman matematik siswa kelas XI SMK di Kota Cimahi pada materi fungsi eksponen. Wacana Akademika: Majalah Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.30738/wa.v2i1.2570
Fatio, N. A., Fatimah, S., & Rosjanuardi, R. (2020). The analysis of students’ learning difficulties on system of linear equation in two variables topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032062
Flogie, A., Lakota, A. B., & Aberšek, B. (2018). The psychosocial and cognitive influence of ICT on competences of STEM students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 267–276.
Iswahyudi, D., & Soenarto. (2019). Optimization of web-based learning media in SMK PGRI 3 Walikukun. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1413(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1413/1/012026
Juandi, D., Kusumah, Y. S., Tamur, M., Perbowo, K. S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). A meta-analysis of GeoGebra software decade of assisted mathematics learning: What to learn and where to go? Heliyon, 7, e06953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06953
Koh, J. H. L. (2006). Motivating students of mixed efficacy profiles in technology skills classes: A case study. Instructional Science, 34(5), 423–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-0001-3
Kulsum, S. I., Hidayat, W., Wijaya, T. T., & Kumala, J. (2019). Analysis on high school students’ mathematical creative thinking skills on the topic of sets. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 431–436.
Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
Lin, Y., Zhou, Y., Wang, S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2020). Lesson design of geometric sequences based on the 6-question cognitive theory. Journal on Education, 2(4), 313–322.
Liu, T. C., Lin, Y. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Identifying senior high school students’ misconceptions about statistical correlation and their possible causes: An exploratory study using concept mapping with interviews. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 791–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9142-y
McLay, K., & Reyes, V. C. (2019). Identity and digital equity: Reflections on a university educational technology course. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(6), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5552
Murphy, M. P. A. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency e-learning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(3), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749
Pangaribuan, F. (2018). Students’ abstraction in solving system of linear equations with two variables. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012071
Peeraer, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). The limits of programmed professional development on integration of information and communication technology in education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.809
Pereira, J., Huang, Y., Chen, J., Hermita, N., & Tamur, M. (2020). Learning the concept of absolute value with Hawgent Dynamic Mathematics Software. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 160–169.
Pieters, J., Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2019). Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6
Puspitasari, E., Yusmin, E., & Nursangaji, A. (2015). Analisis kesulitan siswa menyelesaikan soal cerita materi sistem persamaan linear dua variabel di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 4(5).
Ruqoyyah, S., Murni, S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2020). The effect of VBA for Microsoft Excel as teaching material to improve prospective elementary school teachers’ mathematical conceptual understanding. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 7(2), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v7i2.26494
Shieh, R. S., & Chang, W. (2014). Fostering students’ creative and problem-solving skills through a hands-on activity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(5), 650–661.
Suherman, E. (2008). Model belajar dan pembelajaran berorientasi kompetensi siswa. Educare, 5(2), 1–30.
Sumarni, Hapizah, & Scristia. (2020). Students’ triangles congruence proving through flow proof strategy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1480/1/012030
Sun, J., Rao, N., & Pearson, E. (2015). Policies and strategies to enhance the quality of early childhood education for all 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges.
Syafitri, Q., Mujib, M., Netriwati, N., Anwar, C., & Wawan, W. (2018). The mathematics learning media uses GeoGebra on the basic material of linear equations. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2160
Tamur, M., & Juandi, D. (2020). Effectiveness of constructivism-based learning models against students’ mathematical creative thinking abilities in Indonesia: A meta-analysis study. Proceedings of the 7th Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education International Seminar (MSCEIS 2019). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2296507
Tan, S., Zou, L., Wijaya, T. T., Suci, N., & Dewi, S. (2020). Improving student creative thinking ability with problem based learning approach using Hawgent. Journal on Education, 2(4), 303–312.
Wati, S., Fitriana, L., & Mardiyana. (2018). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of junior high school mathematics teachers in teaching linear equation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1008(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012067
Wijaya, T. T., Purnama, A., & Tanuwijaya, H. (2020). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berdasarkan konsep TPACK pada materi garis dan sudut menggunakan Hawgent Dynamic Mathematics Software. JPMI: Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 3(3), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i3.205-214
Wijaya, T. T., Sukma, M., Purnama, A., & Tanuwijaya, H. (2020). Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis TPACK menggunakan Hawgent Dynamic Mathematics Software. Journal of Elementary Education, 3(3), 64–72.
Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., Cunhua, L., & Zulfah. (2020). Using VBA learning media to improve students’ mathematical understanding ability. Journal on Education, 2(2), 245–254.
Yi, L., Ying, Z., & Wijaya, T. T. (2019). The trend of mathematics teaching method has changed from fragments to systematics. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v3i2.137
Zhang, L., Zhou, Y., & Wijaya, T. T. (2020). Hawgent Dynamic Mathematics Software to improve problem-solving ability in teaching triangles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012069
Zhang, X., Zhou, Y., & Wijaya, T. T. (2020). Hawgent Dynamic Mathematics Software to teach line and angle. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 237–247.
Zulfah. (2017). Analisis kesalahan peserta didik pada materi persamaan linear dua variabel di kelas VIII MTs Negeri Sungai Tonang. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
