Problem Solving Abilities in Social Arithmetic of 8th Grade Students Reviewed From Cognitive Styles

  • Ukas Alif Fuadi Universitas PGRI Argopuro Jember
  • Dimas Andhita Cahyo Sujiwo Universitas PGRI Argopuro Jember
  • Aswar Anas Universitas PGRI Argopuro Jember
Keywords: cognitive styles, reflective, impulsive, problem solve, social arithmetic

Abstract

Quality education in the SDGs aims to improve high-level thinking and problem-solving capabilities at all levels of education. Nevertheless at SMP Baitul Arqom, students has difficulties in solving mathematical problems, especially in social arithmetic. The aim of this research is to determine the ability of 8th grade students at SMP Baitul Arqom in solving social arithmetic problems in terms of impulsive and reflective cognitive styles. This research approach is descriptive, which describes the level of students' problem solving abilities based on impulsive and reflective cognitive styles. Then this research is a qualitative type, because the findings that will be explored in this research do not require procedural statistical analysis. This research was carried out at SMP Baitul Arqom Balung. Data sources include arithmetic test questions, MFFT, and interviews. The research subjects were class VIII students at SMP Baitul Arqom. Based on the results of the MFFT test and social arithmetic problem solving for 8th grade students at SMP Baitul Arqom, it shows that there were 9 impulsive students, 11 reflective students, and 4 students who were neither categorized as impulsive nor reflective. There is a clear difference between impulsive and reflective students. Impulsive students, IS1 and IS2, tended to be quick in responding but often inaccurate, indicating the need for practice in slowing down the decision-making process to increase accuracy. Meanwhile, reflective students, RS1 and RS2, were very accurate but slow, indicating the need for practice in speeding up the thinking process without sacrificing quality

References

Aminah, Suwarno, & Adinda, A. (2023). Analisis berdasarkan tahapan kastolan: bagaimana kesalahan siswa reflektif dan impulsif dalam menyelesaikan soal eksponen ? Aritmatika, 4(2), 106–116.

Appulembang, O. D. (2015). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Aljabar Berpandu Pada Taksonomi Solo Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Konseptual Tempo Siswa Sma Negeri 1 Makale Tana Toraja [Thesis]. Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Awaliya, V. I., & Masriyah. (2022). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sma Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif Dan Impulsif. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 70–79.

Azhil, I. M., Ernawati, A., Lutfianto, M., & Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Al Hikmah Surabaya Jl Kebonsari Elveka Surabaya, J. V. (2017). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif. In JRPM (Vol. 2, Issue 1). http://jrpm.uinsby.ac.id

Erviandita, S., Pramasdyahsari, A. S., & Wulandari, D. (2023). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal eksponen berdasarkan teori kastolan ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif dan impulsif. Algoritma: Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajme.v5i1.31685

Fadiana, jizatin. (2016). Perbedaan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita antara Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dan Impulsif. In Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education ISSN (Vol. 1, Issue 1). http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/jramathedu

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1

Hayuningrat, S., & Listiawan, T. (2018). Proses Berpikir Siswa dengan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Generalisasi Pola. Jurnal Elemen, 4(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v4i2.752

Herianto, & Hamid, N. (2020). Analisis Proses Berpikir Kreatif Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Reflektif Dan Impulsif Siswa. Pedadogy, 5(2), 38–49.

Idris, M., Kodirun, & Wibawa, G. N. A. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Impulsif-Reflektif Menurut Gender (Analysis of Impulsive-Reflective Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability According to Gender). Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika, 7(2), 150–160.

Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2022). Pedoman Teknis Penyusunan Rencana Aksi Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (Tpb)/ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Kurniawati, N., Prayitno, S., Hayati, L., & Subarinah, S. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Aritmatika Sosial Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Impulsif dan Reflektif Siswa MTs. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 2(2), 493–503. https://mathjournal.unram.ac.id/index.php/Griya/index

Muniri, & Yulistiyah, E. (2022). Representasi Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Sistem Persamaan Linear Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Reflektif-Implusif. Plus Minus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 201–210.

Naryaningsih, P. D., Siswono, T. Y. E., & Wintarti, A. (2022). Literasi Matematis Siswa Reflektif dan Siswa Impulsif dalam Menyelesaikan MasalahKontekstual Berorientasi PISA. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 2685–2697. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i3.1408

Panglipur, I. R., & Putra, E. D. (2018). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Dasar Geometri Dengan Pembelajaran Metode Penemuan Terbimbing Pada Mata Kuliah Geometri. LAPLACE: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 33–40.

Ramadanti, A. V., Syahri, A. A., & Kristiawati. (2022). Deskripsi Keterampilan Metakognitif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Konseptual Tempo. Paradikma, 15(1), 32–44.

Rohmah, W. N., Septian, A., Inayah, S., & Suryakancana, U. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis pada Materi Bangun Ruang Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa SMP. Prisma, 9(2), 179–191. https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/prisma

Published
2024-11-07
How to Cite
Fuadi, U., Sujiwo, D., & Anas, A. (2024). Problem Solving Abilities in Social Arithmetic of 8th Grade Students Reviewed From Cognitive Styles. Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 5(2), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v5i2.159
Section
Articles