My Conceptions shape my Practices’, Palestinian Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions and Practices in Fostering Creativity

Sultan Amin Kowkas

doi:10.37303/jelmar.v5i2.157

Sultan Amin Kowkas An-Najah National University, Palestina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v5i2.157

Keywords: mathematical creativity, teachers’ conceptions, teachers’ practices, fostering creativity, palestinian teachers

Abstract

As many abstract terms, creativity is understood differently by people, each according to his/her cognitive background. In addition, creativity is such a sophisticated concept, that its interpretation has constantly evolved over the progression of epochs and within the development of cultures and civilizations. Its schema has transformed over a wide spectrum of descriptions, from the notion of Divine inspiration adopted by early philosophers to the modern outlooks of originality and problem-solving skills. On the other hand, people behave according to their inner beliefs and based on their interacted ideologies. Wherefore, the current study explores 8th and 9th grade, Palestinian Mathematics teachers’ conception of Mathematical Creativity (MC), as well as their teaching practices in fostering MC among students.‎ The study used semi-structured interviews with twenty in-service Mathematics teachers, exploring their conceptions, teaching strategies and interpreting their features in the context of fostering MC in class. The findings revealed that many teachers have good, but not full conception of MC whereas few had misconceptions. Those of good conceptions also integrate teaching practices that aim to foster MC, while those with misconceptions do not. In addition, teachers who believe in their students’ potentials adopt integrating MC-fostering’ practices while those with little belief do not. Moreover, teachers who involve in teaching practices that foster MC were noticed to have positive attitude toward Professional Development. Common challenges and obstacle hindering MC were mentioned by teacher; including official textbook issues, insufficient number of periods and large class sizes.

References

Agustina, L., Zaenuri, Isnarto, & Dwijanto (2024). Students’ Creative Thinking Ability on Problems of Mathematics Literacy. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v24i1.6760

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612823.CH5

Aktaş, M.C. (2015). Turkish High School Teachers' Conceptions of Creativity in Mathematics. Journal of education and training studies, 4, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.11114/JETS.V4I2.1123

Aus, K., Jõgi, A., Poom-Valickis, K., Eisenschmidt, E., & Kikas, E. (2017). Associations of newly qualified teachers’ beliefs with classroom management practices and approaches to instruction over one school year. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 28 - 45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1251897

Ayele, M.A. (2016). Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions on Enhancing Students’ Creativity in Mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11, 3521-3536. https://shorturl.at/9YhjF

Barraza-García, Z. M., Romo-Vázquez, A., & Roa-Fuentes, S. (2020). A theoretical model for the development of mathematical talent through mathematical creativity. Education Sciences, 10(4), 118. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/4/118#

Bendahmane, M. (2023). The Influence of EFL Teachers’ Educational Beliefs on Classroom Practices. ALTRALANG Journal. https://doi.org/10.52919/altralang.v5i01.287

Berterö, C.M. (2012). Grounded theory methodology - has it become a movement? International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 7. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v7i0.18571

Bicer, A. (2021). A systematic literature review: Discipline-specific and general instructional practices fostering the mathematical creativity of students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9 (2), 252-281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1254

Brailas, A.V., Tragou, E., & Papachristopoulos, K. (2023). Introduction to Qualitative Data Analysis and Coding with QualCoder. American Journal of Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr%2F13230

Byers, W. (2010). How mathematicians think: Using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathematics. Princeton University Press.

Byers, W.P. (2014). Deep Thinking: What Mathematics Can Teach Us About The Mind. https://doi.org/10.1142/9247

Campbell, J.L., Quincy, C.D., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O.K. (2013). Coding In-depth Semi-structured Interviews. Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 294 - 320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475

Cox, S.K., Burns, M.K., Hughes, E.M., Wade, T., & Brown, M. (2024). Defining, Measuring, and Teaching Mathematical Flexibility. The Elementary School Journal, 124, 479 - 498. https://doi.org/10.1086/728591

Creswell, J. W., & Zhang, W. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official publication of the international society for traumatic stress studies, 22(6), 612-621. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20479

Cullicott, C.E. (2019). "They Have a Lot of Potential": High School Mathematics Teachers' Perspectives on Difficult Students. Proceedings of the 2019 AERA Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.3102/1440866

de Alencar, E. M. S. (2012). Creativity in organizations: Facilitators and inhibitors. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 87-111). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00005-7

Desli, D., & Zioga, M. (2015). Looking for creativity in primary school mathematical tasks. https://hal.science/hal-01287299/document

Dick, T.P., & Springer, G.T. (2006). Making the Right (Discourse) Moves: Facilitating Discussions in the Mathematics Classroom. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK–12, 100, 105-109. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.100.2.0105

Dickman, B. (2014). Conceptions of Creativity in Elementary School Mathematical Problem Posing. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8MC8X69

Escultura, E.E. (2012). Creative Mathematics Education. Creative Education, 03, 45-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.31008

Fram, S.M. (2013). The Constant Comparative Analysis Method Outside of Grounded Theory. The Qualitative Report, 18, 1-25. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1004995.pdf

Gerson, K. (2020). Constructing an Interview Guide. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199324286.003.0004

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.‏ https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206

Grégoire, J. (2016). Understanding creativity in mathematics for improving mathematical education. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 24-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.24

Guzmán, N. L. (2021). Microsoft Teams como LMS en la educación superior virtual. Revista Compás Empresarial, 12(32), 58-75.‏ https://doi.org/10.52428/20758960.v11i32.61

Haavold, P.Ø., & Birkeland, A. (2017). Contradictory Concepts of Creativity in Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_11

Kettler, T., Lamb, K. N., Willerson, A., & Mullet, D. R. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of ‎creativity in the classroom. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2), 164-171.‎ http://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1446503

Kozlowski, J.S., Chamberlin, S.A., & Mann, E.L. (2019). Factors that Influence Mathematical Creativity. The Mathematics Enthusiast. http://dx.doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1471

Kynigos, C., & Moustaki, F. (2014). Designing digital media for creative mathematical learning. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610479

Leko, M.M., Cook, B.G., & Cook, L. (2021). Qualitative Methods in Special Education Research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36, 278 - 286. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12268

Levenson, E.S., Swisa, R., & Tabach, M. (2018). Evaluating the potential of tasks to occasion mathematical creativity: definitions and measurements. Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 273 - 294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1450777

Lev-Zamir, H., & Leikin, R. (2011). Creative mathematics teaching in the eye of the beholder: focusing on teachers' conceptions. Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 17 - 32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2011.550715

Low, J. (2019). A Pragmatic Definition of the Concept of Theoretical Saturation. Sociological Focus, 52, 131 - 139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1544514

Magnusson, E., & Marecek, J. (2015). Designing the interview guide. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107449893.005

Mashuri, S., Rasak, M.S., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-12%20Issue-1/Ser-5/E1201052229.pdf

Meier, M., Burgstaller, J.A., Benedek, M., Vogel, S.E., & Grabner, R.H. (2021). Mathematical Creativity in Adults: Its Measurement and Its Relation to Intelligence, Mathematical Competence and General Creativity. Journal of Intelligence, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9010010

Metu, C.A., Ugwuanyi, C.C., Nwoye, N.M., Odo, I.O., & Nwachukwu, W.C. (2023). Unlocking Students Areas of Difficulties in Mathematics through the Teachers Creativity Fostering Behaviours. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2023.70932

Miranda, P., & Mamede, E. (2022). Appealing to Creativity Through Solving and Posing Problems in Mathematics Class. Acta Scientiae. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7024

Molad, O., Levenson, E. S., & Levy, S. (2020). Individual and group mathematical creativity among post–high school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104, 201-220. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10649-020-09952-5

Mulyanti, S., Halim, A., Murniati, Ilyas, S., Syukri, M., & Mursal (2021). The impact of the science technology society (STS) approach on critical thinking ability and student learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596%2F1882%2F1%2F012026

Nadjafikhah, M., Yaftian, N., & Bakhshalizadeh, S. (2012). Mathematical creativity: some ‎definitions and characteristics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 285-291.‎ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.056

Pajares, F. (2022). Inviting Self-Efficacy. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.26522/jitp.v3i1.3765

Peltenburg, M., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2012). Teacher perceptions of the mathematical potential of students in special education in the Netherlands. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27, 391 - 407. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2012.701063

Pitta-Pantazi, D., Kattou, M., & Christou, C. (2018). Mathematical Creativity: Product, Person, Process and Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73156-8_2

Roberts, & Rosanne, E. (2020). Qualitative Interview Questions: Guidance for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 25, 3185-3203. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4640

Schnugg, C. (2019). Creativity. Palgrave Studies in Business, Arts and Humanities. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04549-4

Schoevers, E.M., Kroesbergen, E.H., & Kattou, M. (2018). Mathematical Creativity: A Combination of Domain‐general Creative and Domain‐specific Mathematical Skills. The Journal of Creative Behavior. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jocb.361

Stein, C.C. (2007). Let's Talk: Promoting Mathematical Discourse in the Classroom. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK–12, 101, 285-289. https://doi.org/10.5951/mt.101.4.0285

Tabach, M., & Levenson, E.S. (2018). Solving a Task with Infinitely Many Solutions: Convergent and Divergent Thinking in Mathematical Creativity. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99861-9_10

Turan, M., ŞENGİL AKAR, Ş., & YILDIRIM-SAYGI, E. (2023). Middle School Teachers' Views on Mathematical Creativity and Supporting Mathematical Creativity. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi-2023-0032

Tversky, B. (2015). Keynote Address: Tools for Thinking. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15594-4_1

Utami, D.N. (2016). THE EFL TEACHERS’ BELIEFS AND THEIR TEACHING PRACTICES. Okara: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 10, 135-144. https://doi.org/10.19105/OJBS.V10I2.974

Vila-Henninger, L. A. (2019). Turning talk into “rationales”: Using the extended case method for the coding and analysis of semi-structured interview data in ATLAS. ti. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 143(1), 28-52.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106319852887

Vollstedt, M., & Rezat, S. (2019). An Introduction to Grounded Theory with a Special Focus on Axial Coding and the Coding Paradigm. ICME-13 Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_4

Waswa, A. N., & Moore, K. C. (2020). Investigating Elementary Pre-Service Teachers' Conceptions of Mathematical Creativity. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.056

Wessels, H. (2017). Exploring Aspects of Creativity in Mathematical Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62968-1_53

Wilson, C. (2014). Semi-structured interviews. Interview techniques for UX practitioners, 1, 23-41.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410393-1.00002-8