Proof -Based Learning Design Using APOS Theory on Triangle Inequality Theorem Material
Abstract
This research aims to produce a series of activities that can support evidence-based learning on the material of the Triangle Inequality Theorem. The research method used was design research type validation study and involved 22 4th semester students of the Mathematics Education study program at PGRI University Palembang. The research was conducted through 3 stages, namely preliminary design, design experiment and restropective analysis. Data collection was carried out using observation techniques, documentation and activity sheets. The research data were analyzed qualitatively, namely comparing the results of observations during the learning process with the HLT that had been designed. The results showed that the designed activities can support evidence-based learning for Triangle Inequality Theorem material.
References
Arnawa, I. M., Yanita, Ginting, B., Yerizon, & Nita, S. (2020). Improvement a Positive Attitude towards Abstract Algebra through APOS Theory Approach. International Conference on Mathematics and Natural Sciences 2019 (IConMNS 2019). 1503-012008. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012008
Arnawa, I. M., Yerizon, & Nita, S. (2019). Improvement Students’ Level of Proof Ability in Abstract Algebra Trough APOS Theory Approach. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(7), 128-131.
Borji, V., Alamolhodaei, H., & Radmehr, F. (2018). Application of the APOS-ACE Theory to improve Students’ Graphical Understanding of Derivative. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2947-2967.
Darari, M. B., Panjaitan, M., Febrian, D., & Harahap, F. (2021, Juli – Desember ). Efektivitas Penerapan Laboratorium Virtual Pada Mata Kuliah Matematika Dasar di Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Unimed. AXIOM: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Matematika, 10(2), 210-220. doi:10.30821/axiom.v10i2.10437
Darmadi. (2009). Spektrum Hasil Belajar Analisis Real Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika IKIP PGRI Madiun. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (pp. 247-251). Yogyakarta: UNY.
Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A Constructivist Theory of Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Research. In The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level. Springer.
Eerde, D. v. (2013). Design Research: Looking into the Heart of Mathematis Education. 1st SEA-DR PROCEEDING (pp. 1-11). Palembang: Sriwijaya University.
Erawati, N. K. (2018). Kualitas Pengajaran Dosen dan Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa dengan Siklus ACE APOS. Emasains, VII(2).
Erawati, N. K. (2018). Penerapan Siklus ACE APOS pada Mata Kuliah Analisis Riil. Emasains, VII(1), 22-28.
Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local Instruction Theories as Means of Support for Teachers in Reform Mathematics Education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 105-128.
Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design Research from a Learning design Perspective. In J. v. Akker, K. Gravemeijer, & S. M. Nieven, Educational Design Research (pp. 17-51). London: Routledge.
Gunawan, H. (2009). Pegatar Analisis Real. Bandung: ITB Press.
Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, Explanation and Exploration: An Overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5-23.
Hartati, S. J. (2014). Design of Learning Model of Logic and Algorithms Based on APOS Theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 3(2), 109~118.
Haswati, D., Bilda, W., & Nopitasari. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Aktivitas Geometri Analitik Datar Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik. Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika (pp. 113-118). Jakarta: Unindra.
Hidayat, W., & Aripin, U. (2020). Identifikasi Kesalahan Jawaban Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Trigonometri Berdasarkan Dimensi Pengetahuan Krathwohl. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 4(1), 142-153. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v4i1.3316
Isnani, Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, R., Dwijantoe, D., & Asih, T. (2021). Analisis MiskonsepsiMahasiswa padaMata Kuliah Analisis Real. PRISMA: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (pp. 235-238). Semarang: UNNES.
Kartika, E. D., & Yazidah, N. I. (2019). Analisis kemampuan Pembuktian Matematis pada mata Kuliah Analisis Real Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 152-157.
Kholifa, I., Suswanti, & Nuryadi. (2019). Pengembangan Laboratorium Matematika Virtual Dengan Software Appy Pie Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Dan Adaptive E-Learning. Jurnal Mercumatika : Jurnal Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 104-113. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.26486/jm.v3i2.876
Kocijancic, S., & O’Sulivan, C. (2004). Real or Virtual Laboratories in Science Teaching - is this Actually a Dilemma? Informatics in Education, 3(2), 239–250. doi:10.15388/infedu.2004.17
Lameena., C. M., Nusantara, T., & Muksar, E. B. (2018). 2018. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 185-198.
Melhuish, K., Fukawa-Connelly, T., Dawkins, P. C., Woods, C., & Weber, K. (2022). Collegiate mathematics teaching in proof-based courses: What we now know and what we have yet to learn. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 67(100986). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100986
Narain, P., & Stylianides, A. J. (2020). Demystifying proofs through structured interaction: A case study of one. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics. doi:https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.54180
Ningsih, Y. L., Darmawijoyo, & Hartono, Y. (2015). Pengebangan LembarAktivitas mahasiswa Topik Turunan Berdasarkan Teori APOS. Jurnal Pendidikan matematika dan Sains, III(1), 10-22.
Nurizzati, Y. (2016). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Statistika Dasar dengan Metode Praktikum Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter Islami di Jurusan Tadris Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Holistik: Journal For Islamic Social Sciences, 1(1), 36-48.
Nurrahmah, A., Kartono, K., Zaenuri, Z., & Isnarto, I. (2022). Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis: Abstraksi Matematis Mahasiswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan Teori APOS. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (pp. 120-129.). Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang. Retrieved from http://pps.unnes.ac.id/prodi/prosiding-pascasarjana-unnes/
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational Design Research: An introduction. In J. v. Akker, T. Plomp, & N. Nieven, An Introduction of Educational Design Research. Enschede Netherland.
Prahmana, R. L. (2017). Design research (Teori dan implementasinya: Suatu pengantar). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Prastowo, A. (2015). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Rangkuti, A. N., & Siregar, A. I. (2019). Lintasan Belajar Teorema Pythagoras dengan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik. Logaritma : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains, 7(2), 149-162.
Reid, D. (2001). Proof, proofs, Proving and Probing: Research related to proof. Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Risnanosanti, Prasetiyo, A. A., & Syofiana, M. (2023). Hypothetical Learning Trajectory Penalaran Matematis pada Materi Statistika SMP. Indiktika : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 201-210. doi:10.31851/indiktika.v5i2.11743
Saftari, M., & Sariman. (2021). Lembar Aktivitas Mahasiswa Materi Integral Jumlah Riemann Berdasarkan Teori Aksi, Proses, Objek, Skema (APOS). Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika), 3(2), 152 – 163. doi:10.35438/inomatika.v3i2.200
Sagala, S. (2014). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Septiati, E. (2021). Kemampuan Mahasiswa dalam mengkonstruksi Bukti Matematis pada Mata Kuliah Analisis Real. Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 64-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v4i1.6761
Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114-145.
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan teori dan Praktik (edisi kedelapan ed.). Jakarta: PT Indeks.
Slavin, R. R. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktik. PT Indeks.
Supriadi, A. (2021). Pemahaan Mahasiswa Tentang Integral Lipta Dua Berdasarkan Teori APOS. Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 55-63. doi:https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v4i1.6606
Syamsuri, & Marethi, I. (2018). APOS Analysis on Cognitive Process in Mathematical Proving Activities. International Journal on Teaching Learning Mathematics, 1-12.
Wijaya, A., Elmaini, & Doorman, M. (2021). A learning Trajectory for Probabilty: A Case of Game-Based Learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1-16.
Wilhelmi, M. R., Godino, J. D., & Lacasta, E. (2007). Didactic Effectiveness of Mathematical Definitions. IEJME International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education The Case of The Absolute Value, 2(2), 72-90. Retrieved from www.iejme.com
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the journal.
- Authors can publish papers separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions by acknowledging that the manuscripts have been published for the first time in Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR).
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License (CC BY SA): This license allows to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially.
.jpg)
