Metacognitive Blindness in Mathematics Problem-Solving
Abstract
Metacognitive blindness is usually synonymous with low math ability. However, this study reveals the opposite. Metacognitive blindness can also be experienced by students with good learning achievement. This research was conducted on students majoring in Mathematics Education who have the best academic achievement in their class. The data collected is in the form of words obtained through interviews after solving math problems. The results of the qualitative analysis show that subjects who are students with good academic performance can experience anomalous results during the problem-solving process, which is a condition in which the subject feels that the math problem at hand contains errors. The error in question is, the subject stutters the squares on the chessboard that are not the same size, but in reality they are not.
References
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design Pendekatan kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Dorr, L., Perels, F. (2019). Improving Metacognitive Abilities as an Important Prerequisite for Self-regulated Learning in Preschool Children. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. 11(5): 449-459
Dunlosky, J., Hertzog, C., Kennedy, M., & Thiede, K. (2005). The self-monitoring approach for effective learning. International Journal of Cognitive Technology. 10(1), 4–11.
Erickson, S., & Heit, E. (2015). Metacognition and Confidence: Comparing Math to Other Academic Subject. Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 742
Faradiba, S. S., Sa'dijah, C., Parta, I. N., & Rahardjo, S. (2019a). Metacognitive therapy for mathematics disorder. Journal of physics: conference series, 1157(4)
Faradiba, S. S., Sa’dijah, C., Parta, I. N., & Rahardjo, S. (2019b). Looking without seeing: the role of metacognitive blindness of student with high math anxiety. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE). 7(2): 53-65
Goos, M. (2002). Understanding Metacognitive Failure. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 21(3), 283-302.
Hassan, N., & Rahman, S. (2012). Problem Solving Skills, Metacognitive Awareness, and Mathematics Achievement: a Mediation Model. New Educational Review 49(3): 201-212.
Hilawani, Yasser. (2017). Rendezvous with IQ: Metacognition in real-life situations. Educational Studies. Volume 44, issue 2: 119-146
Jacobse, A. E., & Harskamp, E. G. (2012). Towards efficient measurement of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Metacognition Learning 7: 133–149
Kim, Y.R., Park, M.S., Moore, T.J., & Varma, S. (2013). Multiple levels of metacognition and their elicitation through complex problem-solving tasks. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour. 32(3): 377-396
Kim, J.Y., Lim, K.Y. (2019). Promoting Learning in Online, ill structured problem solving: The Effects of Scaffolding Type and Metacognition Level. Computers & Education. Volume 138: 116-129.
Metcalfe, J., and Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 15(1): 174–179.
Miller, T. M., and Geraci, L. (2011). Unskilled but aware: reinterpreting overconfidence in low-performing students. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 37(2): 502–506
Ng, K. E. (2010). Partial Metacognitive Blindness in Collaborative Problem Solving. Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of The Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 446-453. Fremantle: Merga.
Safari, Y., & Arezy, S. (2012). Improving Students' Educational Performance using Strategic Metacognitive Training. Modern Journal of Education (MJE) 1(10-11): 27-31.
Son, L. K., & Sethi, R. (2010). Adaptive Learning and the Allocation of Time. Adaptive Behavior, 18(2): 132–140.
Wismath, S., Orr, D., & Good, B. (2014). Metacognition: Student Reflections on Problem Solving. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching. 25(2): 69-90
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright of the published articles will be transferred to the journal as the publisher of the manuscripts. Therefore, the author confirms that the copyright has been managed by the journal.
- Authors can publish papers separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions by acknowledging that the manuscripts have been published for the first time in Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR).
- The copyright follows Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License (CC BY SA): This license allows to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, for any purpose, even commercially.