Error Analysis of Male and Female Students in Pythagorean Problems Based on Newman’s Error Analysis

Authors

  • Nizar Septyanda Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang, Indonesia Author
  • Retno Marsitin Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang, Indonesia Author
  • Djoko Adi Susilo Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v7i1.12

Keywords:

newman's error analysis, pythagorean theorem, students, mathematics

Abstract

Mathematics education plays a crucial role in equipping students with logical and analytical thinking skills. One of the topics that often presents difficulties is the Pythagorean theorem. This study aims to analyze the types of errors made by male and female students in solving Pythagorean problems based on the stages of Newman’s Error Analysis. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed at SMP PGRI 6 Malang, involving six selected participants from Class VIII A, consisting of three male students and three female students. Data were collected through written tests, structured interviews, and documentation, and then analyzed based on the five stages of Newman, namely reading, comprehension, transformation, process skills, and encoding. The results indicate that male students tend to make errors across almost all stages, primarily due to a lack of accuracy and a weak understanding of fundamental concepts. In contrast, female students demonstrate a significantly lower level of errors, as they are more accustomed to carefully examining the problem information before responding. Based on the findings, it was concluded that female students demonstrated better performance in solving Pythagorean problems, with only 13.3% making errors, compared to male students, of whom 46.7% made errors. Therefore, teachers are expected to design instructional strategies that are responsive to the learning characteristics of both male and female students. Therefore, teachers are expected to design learning strategies that are responsive to the differences in learning characteristics between male and female students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfansyur, A., & Mariyani. (2020). The Art of Data Management: Applying Technique, Source, and Time Triangulation in Social Education Research. Historis, 5(2), 146–150.

Anwar, N. T. (2018). The Role of Mathematical Literacy Skills in Twenty-First Century Mathematics Learning. PRISMA, (Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika), 1, 364–370.

Davita, P. W. C., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analysis of Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability in Term Of Gender. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v11i1.23601

Faisal, T. ., Nasution, N. E., Fatmawati, R., Zahra, F., & Ginting, S. S. B. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Solving Problems on the Pythagorean Theorem in Terms of Gender Differences. 4(Juli), 1–23.

Fauziyah, N., Sesanti, N. R., & Marsitin, R. (2019). Analysis of Students’ Mathematical Problem-Posing Ability in Algebra. 2, 110–117.

Handayani, R. (2020). Social Research Methods. In Bandung (Issue September).

Hasan, N. (2 C.E.). Analysis of Eighth-Grade Students’ Errors in Solving Word Problems Related to the Pythagorean Theorem. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/

Hodiyanto, H. (2014). Improving Students’ Creative Thinking Skills through Problem-Solving Instruction in Set Theory from a Gender Perspective, 3(1), 27–40.

Khusniawati, E., Marsitin, R., Murniasih, T. R., Linier, P., & Variabel, S. (2019). Analysis of Students’ Errors in Polya’s Problem-Solving Process in Solving Algebraic Problems. 2.

Layn, R., & Kahar, S. (2017). Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Mathematical Word Problems. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara (JMEN), 03(02), 59–145.

Marsitin, R. (2017). Mathematical Connections and Creative Thinking in Mathematics Learning through APOS Theory. 5(1), 87–100.

Marsitin, R. (2018). Mathematical Reasoning Ability in Discovery Learning Based on Mind Mapping in Complex Functions 1(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2018.1.1.55-64

Mulyanti, N. R., Yani, N., & Amelia, R. (2018). Analysis of Junior High School Students’ Difficulties in Mathematical Problem Solving on the Pythagorean Theorem 1(3), 415. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i3.p415-426

Nur, A. S., & Palobo, M. (2018). Profile of Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability in Terms of Cognitive Style Differences and Gender. Kreano, Jurnal MatematikaKreatif-Inovatif,9(2),139–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i2.15067

Nurfajriani, W (2014). Data Triangulation in Qualitative Data Analysis. The Addition of Sodium Benzoate and Potassium Sorbate (Anti-Inversion Agents) and Stirring Speed as an Effort to Inhibit Inversion Reactions in Sugarcane Juice, 10 (September), 826–833.

Rahmadani, Y. (2017). Development of Mathematics Teaching Materials Based on the STAD Cooperative Learning Model with the Guided Discovery Method on the Topic of the Pythagorean Theorem for Eighth-Grade Students at MTsN Model Makassar. 21.

Rahmadani, Y., Tayeb, T., & Badruddin. (2018). Mathematics Module Based on the STAD Cooperative Learning Model with the Guided Discovery Method on the Topic of the Pythagorean Theorem. Lentera Pendidikan: Journal of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, 21(1), 23–32.

Rahmania, L., & Rahmawati, A. (2016). Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Word Problems on One-Variable Linear Equations. JMPM: Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v1i2.639nalisis Kesalahan Siswa dal. JMPM: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 165.

Rijali, A. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis. Alhadharah: Journal of Da’wah Studies, 17(33), 81. https://doi.org/10.18592/alhadharah.v17i33.2374

Rohmah, A. S. (2020). Analysis of MTs Students’ Errors in Solving Problems on the Pythagorean Theorem Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 3(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i5.433-442

Sholikah, S., Wati, A. H., Lestari, I. P., & Febianti, D. (2024). Pythagoras in Terms of Differences. 59–72.

Siswandi, E., Sujadi, I., & Riyadi, R. (2016). Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Contextual Mathematical Problems on Quadrilaterals Based on Newman’s Error Analysis in Terms of Gender Differences (A Case Study of Seventh-Grade Students at SMPN 20 Surakarta). Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 4(7), 633–643. http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id

Sudiono, E. (2017). Analysis of Errors in Solving Mathematics Problems on Linear Equations Based on Newman’s Error Analysis. 5(3), 295–302.

Suratih, S., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Analysis of Students’ Errors in Solving Linear Programming Word Problems Based on Newman’s Error Analysis. Pythagoras: Journal of Mathematics Education15(2),111–123. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v15i2.30990

Visitasari, R., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2013). Students’ Ability to Solve Algebraic Word Problems Using Newman’s Analysis Stages. MathEdunesa,2(2),8. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/2705

Y Septiani, E Arribe, R. D. (2020). Analysis of the Service Quality of Abdurrab University’s Academic Information System on User Satisfaction Using the SERVQUAL Method. Journal of Technology and Open Source, 3(1), 131–143.

Zellatifanny, C. M., & Mudjiyanto, B. (2018). Types of Descriptive Research in Communication Studies. Diakom: Journal of Media and Communication, 1(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.17933/diakom.v1i2.20

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Septyanda, N., Marsitin, R., & Susilo, D. A. (2026). Error Analysis of Male and Female Students in Pythagorean Problems Based on Newman’s Error Analysis. Journal of Education and Learning Mathematics Research (JELMaR), 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v7i1.12

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 126

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.