Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Berstandar PISA (Programme for International Student Assesment)

Maryono Maryono

doi:10.37303/jelmar.v1i1.1

Maryono Maryono IAIN Tulungagung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37303/jelmar.v1i1.1

Keywords: thinking process, assimilation, accommodation, Polya problem solving, PISA standard problems

Abstract

One way to measure the development of a country in the main international scale assessment is the PISA (Programme International for Student Assesment). The thinking process of students in solving PISA standard problems can be analyzed using the theory of Assimilation and Accommodation. The approach used in this study is qualitative with the type of case study. The data analyzed in the form of the results of the subject's work when solving problems with PISA standards and the results of interviews with the research subjects. The subject of this study was a prospective student of mathematics at IAIN Tulungagung. The results of the study indicate that the thinking process of students when solving PISA standard problems includes: (a) assimilation: that is, students can directly apply their knowledge to the problems to obtain solutions to problems; and (b) accommodation: i.e. students modify their knowledge to be adapted to existing problems and form new knowledge to suit existing problems.

References

Carson, J. (2007). A Problem With Problem Solving, Teaching Thinking Without Teaching Knowledge. Journal of The Mathematics Educator (2007), Vol. 17, No. 2, 7–14.

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Third edition. California: SAGE Publications.

Dewiyani. (2008). Mengajarkan Pemecahan Masalah dengan Menggunakan Langkah Polya. 88 Stikom Jurnal, Volume 12 Nomor 2.

Ellis, Nick C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, edited by P. Robinson and N. C. Ellis. London: Routledge.

Hayat, B & Yusuf, S. (2010). Benchmark Internasional Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara

Johar, R. (2012). Domain Soal PISA untuk Literasi Matematika. Jurnal Peluang Volume 1 No 1 Universitas Syiah Kuala. Aceh.

Ketut Suma, I Gusti Putu Sudiarta, Ida Bagus Putu Arnyana, I Nengah Martha. (2007). Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Divergen Melalui Pemecahan Masalah Matematika-Sains Terpadu Open-Ended Argumentatif. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 40(4). 800-816.

Lazakidou, G. (2007). The transitory phase to the attainment of self-regulatory skill in mathematical problem solving. International Education Journal 8(1). 71-81. Shannon Research Press.

OECD. (2012). PISA 2012 Mathematics Framework diunduh dari http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/15/46241909.pdf pada tanggal 3 Maret 2016.

Suparno, Paul. (2001).Teori Perkembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget, Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.

Supriadi, D.M & Subanti, Sri. (2015). Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah Polya Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa Kelas VII SMP Al-Azhar Syifa Budi Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika. PPS Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Suryabrata, Sumadi. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Wardhani, S., Rumiati. (2011). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: P4TK Matematika.

Yulaelawati, Ella. (2004). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran filosofi teori dan Aplikasi. Pakar Raya Pustaka. Bandung.

Zhu, Z. (2007). Gender differences in Mathematical Problem Solving Patterns: A Review of Literatur. International Education journal, 8 (2). 187-203. Shannon Research Press.